Search for: "Unknown Sentelle" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm by Rick Pildes
  Contributors included federal and state judges, such as David Sentelle of the D.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:34 pm
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
In his new opinion, Judge Facciola asks EFF to represent the interests of the unknown subject of the records. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:47 am by Mike Scarcella
Chief Judge David Sentelle heard the case with judges Judith Rogers and Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
Court is an all 1890 castOf judges who live long in the past,And whose ideas reflect reaction.Thus, if you desire a decision from hell,Just look to David Sentelle.He so often seems to be thereWhen some form of scumbaggery pervades the air.A protégé of Jesse Helms --Jesse Helms for crying out loud --He always leads the reactionary crowdWhen there is dirty work to be done.Here is one:When the right wing felt an apparently fair Whitewater… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Chief Judge Sentelle’s opinion for the court in Davis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:50 am by Wells Bennett
  After graduating from Duke Law School, he clerked for Judge David Sentelle of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
Twombly (05-1126), that is almost certainly completely unknown  outside of the legal community. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), which is a case governing private party lawsuits against federal officials for Constitutional violations. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Ryan Snyder
Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 8:57 am
But Friendly got it in mind once that the SEC had made a terrible mistake in charging some then unknown capitalist with crooked conduct of one sort or another. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
Circuit panel of Judges Sentelle, Tatel, and Edwards reversed Judge Bates’s April 2009 opinion denying a government motion to dismiss—the government had moved the court to dismiss the three Bagram detainees’ habeas petitions, and it argued that section 7(a) of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 was constitutional and thus precluded federal court review. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The argument took place before a panel consisting of Judges David Sentelle, Janice Brown, and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Much remains unknown about Barrett’s views on significant issues that will likely come before the Supreme Court in the near future. [read post]